Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 14:35:38 11/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2002 at 15:12:37, S. Loinjak wrote: >(I wouldn't take into 3 fold repetition and the 50 moves rule as they seem >artificial for me - they are not defined by the pure rules of chess itself.) This shoots your entire argument right into the ground. 3-fold reptition and the 50 move rule ARE part of chess. Just because "they seem artificial" to you has no bearing on the fact that they are included in the rules of chess. I can prove a lot of things if I am allowed to assume whatever I want.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.