Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 01:30:34 12/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2002 at 20:35:17, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >That is where we disagree. I believe it is sufficient to solve one problem, if >you solve the right one. > It is better to solve one general problem than two specific problems, if you can do it elegantly, cleanly and orthorgonally. However, I don't believe you can do that in the case of chess, if you still want to follow the same old scheme of searching, reaching quiet positions and evaluating. Of course, one can have an entirely new idea and do things in a different and better way. I am not saying this can't be done. I am just saying that until you get that very good idea, separating qsearch and normal search is a good idea. They are _not_ one problem, as things are now. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.