Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 12:41:32 12/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
Oh and the last one... Time Depth Score Positions Moves ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0:00 1/3 1.37 1385 4.cxb6 Qe4+ 5.Rcg2 Nxg2 6.bxa7 0:00 1/3 1.56 2223 4.c4 Qe4+ 5.Rcg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 bxc5 0:00 1/3 1.96 2552 4.Qb5 Qe4+ 5.Rcg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 0:00 1/4 -1.65 5887 4.Qb5 Qf3+ 5.Rgg2 Qd1+ 6.Rg1 Qxc2 7.Qb4 0:00 1/4 0.00 6747 4.c4 Qe4+ 5.Rcg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 Qe1+ 7.Rg1 Qe4+ 8.Rg2 0:00 1/4 1.58 7825 4.Qb1 Qf3+ 5.Rgg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 bxc5 7.Qe1 0:00 1/5 1.41 28057 4.Qb1 Qxc5 5.Qb3 Qc6+ 6.Rgg2 Nxg2 7.Rxg2 0:00 1/6 1.57 79858 4.Qb1 Qxc5 5.Rg3 Qd5+ 6.Kg1 Nf3+ 7.Kf2 Nxg5 8.Kf1 0:00 1/7 1.51 139518 4.Qb1 Qxc5 5.Rg3 Qd5+ 6.Kg1 Nf3+ 7.Kf2 Nxg5 8.Kf1 f6 0:02 1/8 1.60 387909 4.Qb1 Qxc5 5.Rg3 Qd5+ 6.Kg1 Nf3+ 7.Kf2 Nxg5 8.Qf1 Qc5+ 9.Ke1 0:05 1/9 0.08 905794 4.Qb1 Qf3+ 5.Rgg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 Ng4 7.Qe1 Ne3 8.Qe2 Qe4 9.h4 Qb1+ 10.Kh2 Nxg2 11.Kxg2 bxc5 0:11 1/10 0.18 1969170 4.Qb1 Qf3+ 5.Rgg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 Ng4 7.Qe1 Ne3 8.Qe2 Qe4 9.h3 bxc5 10.c4 Qxg2+ 11.Qxg2 Nxg2 12.Kxg2 0:28 1/11 0.00 4905061 4.Qb1 Qe4+ 5.Rcg2 Ned3 6.Qf1 Nxg2 7.Rxg2 Nf4 8.cxb6 Nxg2 9.Qf6+ Kg8 10.Qd8+ Kg7 11.Qf6+ 0:59 1/12 0.00 10481574 4.Qb1 Qe4+ 5.Rcg2 Ned3 6.Qf1 Nxg2 7.Rxg2 Nf4 8.cxb6 axb6 9.Qg1 Nxg2 10.Qxg2 Qe1+ 11.Qg1 Qe4+ 12.Qg2 Ernst. On December 02, 2002 at 15:38:06, Ernst Walet wrote: >CM9K's result on a Celeron 1200, SS=12. > >Ernst. > >On December 02, 2002 at 13:45:57, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>I've been looking at some positions from the Warp-Diep game from the WCCC in >>Maastricht this year. Here are a few test positions: >> >>[D]7k/p3Qp1p/1p2n3/4nqP1/2P5/2P3R1/P5RP/3r2BK w - - >> >>Warp played Qe8+ followed by Qa4 here, which wasn't very good. >>Qf6+ was suggested and certainly looks like an improvement, although perhaps its >>not so easy to white to make progress there. >> >>The current Warp however prefers Qxa7, which also looks good. Personally I like >>Qxa7 better than Qf6. >>What do other engines play here? >> > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 2.24 2935 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.Re2 Nxc4 > 4.Rg4 >0:00 1/4 2.27 6396 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.Re2 Nxc4 > 4.Bd4 >0:00 1/5 2.40 20869 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.Re2 Nxc4 > 4.Rg4 Nd6 >0:00 1/6 2.36 54867 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Re2 Rd5 5.Rge3 >0:01 1/7 2.52 120753 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Re2 Rd5 5.Rge3 Nc4 6.Re4 >0:02 1/7 2.55 259998 1.Qxa7 Nf4 2.Qa8+ Kg7 3.Rf2 Ng4 > 4.Rb2 Nd3 5.Re2 Qxg5 >0:04 1/8 2.30 613866 1.Qxa7 Qe4 2.Qxb6 Nf3 3.Qb8+ Kg7 > 4.Rxf3 Qxf3 5.Qe5+ Kg8 6.Qe2 Qxe2 > 7.Rxe2 Nxg5 8.Re8+ Kg7 >0:05 1/8 2.38 665567 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Re2 Rd5 5.Be3 a6 6.Re1 >0:07 1/9 2.56 1113374 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Re2 Rd5 5.Rb2 Rd8 6.Rb7 a6 7.Be3 >0:14 1/10 2.65 2214054 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Rb2 h5 5.Rb7 a6 6.Re3 Rd5 7.Re2 >0:25 1/11 2.97 4181952 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Rb2 Nd7 5.Rd2 Nxf6 6.Rxd8+ Nxd8 > 7.Bxc5 Nc6 8.Bd4 Nxd4 9.cxd4 >0:48 1/12 2.93 8213459 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Rb2 a5 5.Rb5 Nc6 6.Rb7 Ne5 7.Ra7 > Nd7 8.Rd3 >2:13 2/13 3.14 22361859 1.Qf6+ Qxf6 2.gxf6 Rd8 3.c5 bxc5 > 4.Rb2 h5 5.Rb7 Rd7 6.Rb8+ Kh7 7.Bxc5 > Ng4 8.Be7 Rd1+ 9.Rg1 Rd2 > >>[D]8/p4pkp/1p2n3/2P1n1P1/8/1QP3R1/P5RP/2qr2BK b - - >> >>Here Diep played Nf4!! which forces a draw. How long do other engines take to >>find Nf4 ? >>Warp needs about 11 minutes on my PIII 1Ghz. >> >>[D]8/p4pkp/1p6/2P1n1P1/5n2/1QP1q3/P1R4P/6RK w - - >> >>This is the game after Nf4 Rc2 Rxg1 Rxg1 Qe3. >>How long for your engine to show a draw score here? Warp's score drops to +0.3 >>at depth 12, in about 3.5 minutes. I'll let it continue to see when it sees the >>draw. >> > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 1.04 1751 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Kg8 3.Re2 >0:00 1/4 0.84 5698 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Re1 3.Qd4 Qb1 >0:00 1/5 1.16 17322 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Rd5 3.Re3 Qf1 4.Qh4 >0:00 1/6 0.94 77961 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Kf8 3.Qh4 Kg8 4.Re2 >0:01 1/7 1.00 170243 1...Nxc5 2.Qb5 Kf8 3.a4 Qf4 4.Qe2 > Rf1 5.Re3 >0:02 1/8 0.90 383070 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Re1 3.Qd4 Ne6 4.Qd6 > Qf4 5.Qd5 >0:05 1/9 1.07 797519 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Re1 3.Qd4 Ne6 4.Qa4 > Nf4 5.Rf2 Ned3 6.Qd4+ Kg8 >0:14 1/10 0.87 2397651 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Re1 3.Qd4 Ne6 4.Qd6 > Qf4 5.Qd5 Qf1 6.c4 Nxc4 >0:37 1/11 1.08 6455449 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Re1 3.Qd4 Ne6 4.Qd6 > Qb1 5.Qb4 Qd1 6.Qe7 a6 7.Rh3 >1:39 1/12 0.87 17246273 1...Nxc5 2.Qb4 Re1 3.Qh4 Ne4 4.Rh3 > Kf8 5.g6 Nxg6 6.Qd8+ Kg7 7.Qd4+ > Kg8 8.Rxg6+ fxg6 9.Qd8+ Kf7 10.Rxh7+ > Ke6 11.Qd7+ Ke5 >4:23 1/12 0.00 45268994 1...Nf4 2.Rc2 Rxg1+ 3.Rxg1 Qe3 > 4.Qb1 Qf3+ 5.Rgg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 Ng4 > 7.Qg1 Ne3 8.c6 Nxg2 9.Qxg2 Qd1+ > 10.Qg1 Qf3+ 11.Qg2 >5:39 2/13 0.03 58155662 1...Nf4 2.Rc2 Rxg1+ 3.Rxg1 Qe3 > 4.Qb1 Qf3+ 5.Rgg2 Nxg2 6.Rxg2 Ng4 > 7.Qg1 Ne3 8.h4 bxc5 9.Qf2 Qxg2+ > 10.Qxg2 Nxg2 11.Kxg2 > >>thanks, >>Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.