Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 22:47:15 12/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
>>Directly Qxa7 instead of Qf6 i don't want to analyze too well in fact. >>A short line should do, because i get directly many fail lows after >>after Nf4 there for white, so it is trivial that black has excellent draw >>chances there 4 pieces combining against a poor white king. i don't see >>how Peter can believe in that for white. He needs a chess course :) Ah, with friends like Vincent who needs enemies? I'm sure this is the logic that Kramnik too used when he lost to Fritz :-) Translation: computers are good at wriggling out of sticky looking positions. Oh wait the whole Kramnik match was yet another conspiracy, darn I forgot about that... > >perhaps after Qxa7 a direct Qe4 is directly forcing a draw there. >white can win a bunch of pawns by some sacrafices on g6 but then >white has to give always perpetual check after: > >qxa7 qe4 qxb6 nf3 g6 hg6 rg4 qa8 rxg6 fxg6 qxe6 nxg1 qf6+ Of course even my stupid program knows that it must sacrifice a rook for one of those menacing knights and try to win the endgame with 3 extra pawns. So instead of g6, better is either Rxf3 or Qb8+ followed by Rxf3. > >it takes diep a while to see that this is a draw. weird. looks >trivial to me as long as you don't lose the d1 rook.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.