Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:32:30 12/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2002 at 20:44:07, Bob Durrett wrote: >On December 05, 2002 at 20:05:30, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On December 05, 2002 at 17:32:13, Bob Durrett wrote: >> ><snip> > >>>I'm not clear what you mean when you say "Positional >>>Position." [Also, what is it, exactly, that is "impossible"?] >> >>Example, a position without tactics, meaning without ordinary eval advantages. > ><snip> > >Well, maybe we need help from the chess programmers on this one. I do not know >what "ordinary eval advantages" would be. Perhaps is depends on the chess >engine. One engine might ordinarily identify certain kinds of advantages and >another chess engine might ordinarily identify a different set of kinds of >advantages. > >I prefer to give the chess engine programmers the benefit of the doubt on this >one. They probably have done a lot of work in making their position evaluation >code work well with a wide range of position types. But I'm just guessing, of >course. : ) I can only say that I did not work a lot of making my position evaluation. I think that programs can earn a lot from other ideas. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.