Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation rules (?)

Author: Steven Schwartz

Date: 13:40:08 09/17/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 17, 1998 at 16:10:44, Moritz Berger wrote:

>On September 17, 1998 at 16:01:22, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>Feel free, although I changed the subject header, since this has absolutely
>>nothing to do with Rolf.
>
>You are perfectly right that this is drifting away from the Rolf Tueschen issue,
>I just picked up some other things you stated, namely that my point of view was
>"too inflexible". I wrote:
>
>-----------------------
>I don't subscribe to the equation that if somebody posts *also* on topic, he has
>any more rights to attack others than somebody who posts *nothing* on topic.
>
>The general rule on CCC ought to be: No abusive attacks whatsoever.
>No exception to the rule, no matter if person x posts gazillion of on topic
>posts, too.
>
>Reason: Protecting the victims of personal attacks, legitimation of any kind of
>moderation efforts.
>-----------------------
>
>Too inflexible (Bruce) or a self-understood necessity (Moritz), does anybody
>else care to comment?
>
>Moritz

Language differences and cultural difference very often are
more to blame for what some of us see as personal attacks than
the true feelings of the alleged "abuser".

I once again point back to a previous CCC opinion poll. We are
composed of the entire gamut of viewpoints as to what is
acceptable in posting; however, I do not believe that anyone
here is so liberal as to accept today's Mick posts (the
moderators erased them, but similar posts can be found on rgcc).
Not even Fernando:-}

-Steve




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.