Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:42:04 09/17/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1998 at 15:56:14, Moritz Berger wrote: >Here's the 2 games from the 1st Sveshnikov Nunn position at tournament time >controls. I found the games to be very interesting, if not revealing. So please >do yourself a favor and take a look at the actual moves, not only the scores. > >The PII-400 (256 MB RAM) I used for CST (Paris version including new style from >www.oxford-softworks.com) is about 2.5 times as fast as the P233MMX (128 MB >RAM), according to the built-in CST benchmark. for how many time shall i tell you that the "paris" version that chris once put on the server is a) not the real paris version b) buggy and weak because of bugs c) only the cstblack.exe is the one that shall be used with the dos-version. I can send anybody who wants to get it, the version via email. it makes no sense imo to test a version that is obviously broken. This whole stuff about the "paris" version was posted in rgcc long time ago. still you use it. i have told torsten tschoop the same. i don't understand why you like to test a version that is broken. it is not the paris version. i know it better because i operated in paris. chris has taken any kind of version, maybe with closed eyes when he was drunken and called / named it PARIS. why do you use it when there is a stronger version (cstblack.exe) ? Any reason that would make sense ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.