Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What do programmers think about a chess algorithm??

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 09:53:43 12/11/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 11, 2002 at 06:31:26, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:

>On December 10, 2002 at 18:24:40, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On December 10, 2002 at 18:05:15, Ingo Lindam wrote:
>>
>>>On December 10, 2002 at 17:56:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 10, 2002 at 17:51:40, Ingo Lindam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On December 10, 2002 at 17:30:47, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On December 10, 2002 at 13:42:36, Bernardo Wesler wrote:
>>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>>>THE ALGORITHM. A MATHEMATICAL FORMULA THAT , FOR EXAMPLE, ASSURE YOU THAT IF YOU
>>>>>>>DO THE FIRST MOVE YOU ALWAYS WIN.
>>>>>>>I MEAN TO THINK ABOUT DISCOVERING A CHESS ALGORITHM IS AN UTHOPY?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Provably impossible on current hardware and software systems.
>>>>>>Maybe in 100 years the game will be formally solved.  Not in the near futre.
>>>>>
>>>>>provably impossible on current hardware...?
>>>>>are you sure?
>>>>
>>>>I think he meant probably and not provably.
>>>
>>>unfortunately I meant provably and is absolutely sure that there isn't any doubt
>>>about this!
>>>
>>>so I guess the answer/solution/proof on the question: How many prime numbers
>>>exist?
>>
>>The number of primes is uncountable.  Euclid proved it quite a while ago.
>>
>
>It is 'infinite'. 'uncountable' is a technical mathematical word in English
>which means something else (and no, the set of prime numbers is not
>uncountable).

Yes, I used the wrong word.  Hard to imagine that I was a math major.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.