Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:38:01 12/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2002 at 12:08:04, Matt Taylor wrote: >On December 17, 2002 at 11:50:59, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On December 17, 2002 at 11:28:27, Matt Taylor wrote: >> >>>On December 17, 2002 at 11:20:38, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>Deep Fritz 7 runs about 8% faster on a dual Xeon 2400 (detected as 4 cpus)than >>>>on a dual AMD MP 2200+ (2x1800 GHz). Both with DDR 333. >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>Which board/chipset? >> >>This friend of mine tells me that the 2x2400 Xeon machine has RDR, not DDR, >>sorry. Here are some specs (in Spanish): >> >>Placa Base SuperMicro P4DC6+ >> >>- Chip-Set Intel© 860, Bus 400. Soporta RIMM 800Mhz. 4 bancos de memoria. >>Ampliación máxima 2Gb. 2,5v. >>- Controladora Adaptec 7899W Ultra 160 Dual. >>- Slots de expansión: 2 PCI 64bits, 4 PCI 32bits, 1 AGP 4x Pro. >>- Salidas externas: 2 serie, 1 paralelo, 4 USB 1.1., 2 PS/2. >>- Soporta Adaptec SCSI RAID 2005S. >> >>Memoria RAM 1Ghz Rambus 800 Kingston >> >>- Velocidad de 8ns. RIMM de 800Mhz. >>- Garantía de por vida. Índice de fallo: 1%. >> >>Enrique >> >>> I haven't seen any SMP boards that support better than a >>>133 MHz FSB, and it's been a bitter disappointment. >>> >>>-Matt > >That's only 100 MHz. I was interested in the Athlon, though. My Athlon SMP >system has a 133 MHz bus, and I've been sorely disappointed that no 166 MHz bus >has popped up. I'm not suprised since JEDEC didn't standardize DDR-2 until this >past summer, and it won't likely be out to market until next summer. >-Matt It's no coincidence that dual machines have always slower latencies than single cpu machines can have. It isn't easy to let them cooperate with each other!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.