Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SURPRISING RESULTS P4 Xeon dual 2.8Ghz

Author: Matt Taylor

Date: 12:27:31 12/17/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 17, 2002 at 15:19:34, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On December 17, 2002 at 14:21:10, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On December 17, 2002 at 13:15:36, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On December 17, 2002 at 11:58:21, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 17, 2002 at 11:27:18, Matt Taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Crafty gets better results with HT,
>>>>
>>>>In addition to what Vincent said, the data we currently
>>>>have is saying exactly the opposite.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I don't follow.  I posted the following twice already:
>>
>>I've done my own tests.
>>
>>>1 thread, SMT disabled, 24 positions, run twice, 1001.5K nps
>>>2 threads, SMT disabled, same conditions,        1604.5K nps
>>>3 threads, SMT enabled, same conditions,         1820.25K nps
>>>4 threads, SMT enabled, same conditions,         1923.0K nps
>>>
>>>Hyperthreading took the 16.04.5K nps for two bare xeon processors and
>>>improved that by 20%.  I can certainly post the raw data if it is important.
>>>I believe 20% is definitely better than 11%.  And 20% is not something to wave
>>>off as unimportant.
>>
>>I measured similar numbers for 1->2 cpus (24%). But this is only
>>NPS increase, not the actual speedup which will be lower.
>
>So?  That's outside the scope of the SMT/HT discussion.  The question is "does
>it
>work" not "does it work well for chess applications."
>
>>--
>>GCP

Intel claims 30-40% for the former. Dr. Hyatt claims about 20% for the latter.
Vincent claims 11% for the latter. Eugene reports some things going 100% faster.

The question of which application is entirely relevant for obvious reasons. In
the general case, most things will benefit. Whether or not they benefit -much-
is different, but it doesn't really matter. HT isn't costing Intel more than
pocket change to add to the CPU. Even a 1% speed gain for a dollar isn't too
bad. It's just unfortunate that you can't buy CPUs on that curve. AthlonXP 2100
= $85. If only you could double performance for an extra $100! All an extra $100
gets you is AthlonXP 2400.

-Matt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.