Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:55:29 09/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1998 at 13:20:32, Moritz Berger wrote: >I strongly object against your classification of my behavior. Your language is >repulsive to me, I would be grateful if you took my feelings into account when >writing such things about me. what do you want moritz. you refused to test the not-broken version. you insisted to test the broken one. Your only point why you did it was: it is on the server. It is on the server , as researches have found out, because 289 has been deleted, because people complained. >You forgot to mention that I'm responsible for El Nino, too. And the Asian >recession ... Not to mention global warming and the ozon layer. Pah - you have your point of views, we have ours. When we say we delete it from the server because of your behaviour, we are not joking. If we say we do not release cstal win95 because of people like you, we don't joke at all too. If you don't take it serious, ok - your thing. But the things are like they are written. >>We are not releasing Chess System Tal Win95 to make money. We are interested in >>making a strong and knowledged playing chess program, get echo from nice >>end-customers. >You describe "end-customers" as if they were some kind of sheep. Why ? Because oxford softworks has done something chessbase refused to do ? By putting a patch for free on the server where chessbase refused to deliver for free ?! The only difference i see is that oxford listens to the complains of users and reacts. This is new to you as i understand. you are used to people complain and chessbase does NOT react. I understand your problem. you are used to completely different behaviour. I don't think sheep is the right way to describe cstal customers or any customer. >Kind regards selbige kindliche grüße zurück. >Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.