Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 13:18:06 12/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2002 at 15:54:52, John Lowe wrote: <snip> >If you're talking about "intelligent" computers - e.g. transferring ideas born >in one environment to a different set of circumstances, biting the bullet and >learning from experience........ WOW! <snip> No, I regret that I was not thinking that far ahead. But now that you mention it, . . . I guess it's just a matter of deciding what kinds of information to transfer. But first the desired information must be obtained or produced [by the program.] Before that, someone or something must decide what sorts of information are to be obtained/produced by the software. Someone may have to "put on his or her thinking cap" for that one. : ) Are you sure that doing what you suggest would be sufficient for the program to be correctly called "intelligent"? Many humans prefer to believe that computers can never "think" intelligently. Some may feel that it is taboo to try to make a computer that can match humans. Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.