Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 11:52:30 12/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2002 at 05:53:16, Martin Giepmans wrote:
>On December 30, 2002 at 05:30:45, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>As it seems I have completely mishandled explaining Reduction 2b and 2c, I have
>>corrected things.
>>
>>http://members.home.nl/matador/chess840.htm
>>
>>Click on the blue "update" picture, it will move you directly to the changes
>>made. That will be standard procedure from now on in case of errors.
>>
>>if (remaining_depth<=x && remaining_depth>1) then
>> { if (ALPHA < SCORE + THREAT) -> do not reduce
>> if (ALPHA < SCORE + THREAT + MARGIN) -> reduce depth with one ply. }
>>
>> SCORE : score of EVAL
>> THREAT : Queen=900, Rook=500, Bishop=300, Knight=300, Pawn=100
>> MARGIN : TABLE [remaining_depth];
>>
>> static int TABLE[]= { 00,00,10,15,20,25,25,25,25,25,25,25,25,25,
>> 25,25,25,25,25,25,25 ........... };
>>
>>The idea is, if SCORE+THREAD are not going to make it to ALPHA, but with an
>>extra small MARGIN it will then reduce the depth. I can't remember the speed-up
>>this reduction gave.
>>
>>====
>>
>>Ed
>>
>>PS, the "faulty stuff" plus Uri's correction is maybe worth a try, who knows :)
>
>The < in the second formula should be > ?
>Otherwise the two formula's together don't make sense.
>(if the first is true, the second is also true)
>
>Martin
I think it's:
if ((remaining_depth <= x) && (remaining_depth > 1)) then
{ if (ALPHA < SCORE + THREAT) -> do not reduce
*else* if (ALPHA < SCORE + THREAT + MARGIN) -> reduce depth by one ply. }
Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.