Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 22:05:54 01/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2003 at 13:59:46, Omid David Tabibi wrote: [snip] >It might be scientific, it might be not. Maybe we have a different idea of what 'scientific' means then. One of the things it involves for _me_ is that it's possible to tell whether something is scientific or not. ;) >Anyway, it will definitely be more >scientific than the IBM match for sure. It might be more scientific, it might be not. :p (read: I think you're more prejudiced in this case than anything ;) Sargon PS. Sorry for all the smileys =)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.