Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 02:12:07 01/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2003 at 03:53:24, Tony Werten wrote: >On January 08, 2003 at 03:28:26, Steve Maughan wrote: > >>Ed, >> >>The 'penny drops'! Seriously good trick! >> >>So I can see that this is potentially a replacement for SEE (and more). Have >>you any idea if it is faster than SEE - what percentage of CPU time is taken up >>with this type of board scanning? My gut feel is that it'll probably be a >>little slower but contain more knowledge >Depends I think. If you want to use it only for ordering captures, there is not >a lot of difference. >If you want to use it in eval to loop over the board and see who is controling >each square, it's a winner. Also for finding who's controling the squares around >the king it's very nice. You got it. I do hope you understand the downside too? It's a total rewrite of your program :) Ed >Tony > >> >>Thanks, >> >>Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.