Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Languages revisited. Functional language beats C for number cruncing

Author: Dan Andersson

Date: 09:10:55 01/10/03

Go up one level in this thread


Not much to disagree on here. I do know that you have strong opinions. But the
results are beginning to mount. Functional programming is no slower than
imperative in theory. And the practice of it is catching up. Putting the
question to the current 'high performance' languages is just an illustration of
the current state of the art.

MvH Dan Andersson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.