Author: Mike Hood
Date: 06:56:46 01/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2003 at 09:39:04, K. Burcham wrote: > > >I do not understand the comparision anyway. We do not compare a 1910 car with a >2002 car either. > >You compare deep blue. no nullmove, no good eval (for 1997 standards sufficient >though) with the formula 1 cars that we build today. > > >Best Regards, >Vincent > > >Vincent, lets use your example since you want to compare Deep Blue to the >automobile, and the formula 1 cars. >Lets go to the salt flats with a 1997 car, (more realistic time reference), that >is capable of a top speed of 2000 miles an hour. Also take a car from 2003, and >this top speed is 200 miles per hour. the 2003 car has more knowledge about the >goals wanted by the humans, get to the finish line first. the 2003 car is more >stable, rides better, better interface, looks better, etc. >i think i will put my money on the speed for now. > >kburcham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.