Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Languages revisited. Functional language beats C for number cruncing

Author: Dan Andersson

Date: 11:19:54 01/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


The thing is that functional languages are now at a point where they are a
viable alternative to imperative programming. They are as fast. Thus one has no
reason not to choose them for a problem that lends itself to easy implementation
in a functional way.

MvH Dan Andersson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.