Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 23:40:01 01/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2003 at 21:57:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 13, 2003 at 18:25:01, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On January 13, 2003 at 15:30:50, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>Am I really the only one who finds it inappropriate to badmouth other CCC >>members in the third person, as though they weren't reading it? >> >>There is a rule of thumb, "if you can't find anything nice to say about people, >>don't say anything". :) >> >>-S. > >Excuse me but you have missed or misunderstood the reason for the little >exchange between Bob and me. >The facts and also his verdict could not be denied. >But then I had enough of the continual automatism and wanted to _solve_ >something. That's very noble of you, but I doubt you will smooth the waters by calling people childish. >Please re-read the whole thread. The facts can't be denied. >And they >are ridiculous enough to justify a bit of "badmouthing" to say the least, Since when did two wrongs make a right? >also >because the facts are in itself _insulting_ enough, So you felt you have to state these "facts". >if you know what I mean. >There's a rule of thumb, "if you don't understand what people are talking about, >don't say anything". :) Of course not, who would ever do a thing like that?? >BTW I had a lot of nice things to say about Vincent, which was the reason for my >defending attempt to try the improbable. Why _say_ anything about Vincent, why _say_ anything about anyone here? You should feel free to disagree with _what_ they say, but don't do personal attacks, please, it has never been on-topic and it never will be. >Mission impossible. ?? >Last but not least, because we're in a computerchess talk: you resemble the >computer progs who show the correct eval for wrong reasons! All your phrasing is >correct but in this particular case it's the wrong remedy. Maybe you are right about that, but this ongoing psycobable on the character flaws of CCC members is not productive. >And your clever >mottos don't work here since the case is already almost fatally dead. Then you >can't remain passive. So I showed up with a possible solution. The rest should >remain private. Thank you for your understanding. But don't be surprised if next >time I'll simply answer "Shut up!" in time pressure or such some. I just learned >the expression in CTF from a kid... :) Yes, tell me to shut up, that might finally get the moderators attention... ;) -S. >Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.