Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 11:31:40 01/14/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 14, 2003 at 13:16:36, Uri Blass wrote:

>On January 14, 2003 at 13:02:21, David Rasmussen wrote:
>
>>You display poor mathematical understanding.
>>
>>/David
>
>If someone display poor mathematical understanding it is the programmers who let
>me to lose rating from winning games.
>
>I have no reason to learn how to set formulas on ICC.
>It is not about learning math.
>
>If I set formula not to play against weaker players I am going to inflate my
>rating relative to people who do not do it.
>
>Uri


Such people ("...people who do not do it") are in a small minority and their
ratings get quickly corrected by the majority so that there is little
difference.

Where there is group that is inflated/deflated with respect to others occurs
only when there is an explicit or tacit "policy" that largely segregates a group
of players from the rest.

Computer accounts tend to be such a group, because most humans will not play
them even when they have a comparable rating. Computers tend to only play each
other.

Not playing players significantly lower rated is not, since such a pairing of
players is rare anyway.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.