Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 19:34:23 01/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2003 at 22:29:46, Bob Durrett wrote: >On January 14, 2003 at 10:43:20, Uri Blass wrote: > >> >>{Game 494 (MoveiXX vs. ACCIDENTE) ACCIDENTE resigns} 1-0 >>Blitz rating adjustment: 2635 --> 2602 >> >>Movei won a game and lost rating. >> >>Uri > >I do not know whether or not that was a provisional rating. > >If it was, then how would one decide the provisional rating of a competitor >before many games are played? > >All the information available is the ratings of the opponents and the game >outcomes. > >To see what may be happening here, consider a few hypothetical examples: > >First, suppose Movei played five games and won all five. Suppose the ratings of >Movei's five opponents were 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, and 1000. What provisional >rating would you assign to movei in that case? > >Secondly, suppose Movei played five games and won all five. Suppose the ratings >of Movei's five opponents were 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, and 3000. What >provisional rating would you assign to movei in that case? > >One possibility would be to simply refuse to give Movei any provisional rating >at all, in either case. Perhaps that would be the best choice. > >But if one had to assign a provisional rating in each of the above two cases, >what would you do? > >Clearly, in the second case it seems very likely that Movei was stronger than >any of the opponents, each rated 3000. > >Similarly, in the second case it seems very likely that Movei was stronger than >any of the opponents, each rated 1000. But it would seem unwise to assign a >provisional rating above 3000. > >So, the two cases are different. > >The person assigning the provisional rating must go by the ratings of the >opponents. > >Now consider a third case. Suppose Movei drew the first four games against >opponents rated 1000. Then Movei WON the fifth game against an opponent rated >3000. Would it make any sense at all to assign Movei a provisional rating above >3000 in that case? I think not. > >In the situation presented, Movei already had a rating. If it were an >ESTABLISHED rating, then there is no way that Movei's rating should go down after a win. One must assume, then, that Movei had a provisional rating. Here, Movei has played a number of games, but the rating of the last opponent, being low, pulls down the average rating of the group of opponents used to produce the provisional rating. In summary: It is commonplace for provisional ratings to be based on the average rating of the games played and on the combined win/draw/loss score. What Movei experienced makes sense in the context of provisional ratings.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.