Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:15:51 01/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2003 at 00:01:07, Luis Smith wrote: >On January 15, 2003 at 21:48:24, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>On January 15, 2003 at 21:42:24, David Rasmussen wrote: >> >>>On January 15, 2003 at 21:27:04, Mike Byrne wrote: >>> >>>>>00:00:17.67 10Mn 12/21/22 -0.225 1. Nxe5 Qxe2 2. Nxd7+ Ke7 >>>>> 3. Re1 Qb5 4. Nxf6 Nxf6 >>>>> 5. Qxc7+ Qd7 6. Qc1 Nf7 >>>>> 7. f4 Qa7+ 8. Kg2 (10448059) >>>>>00:00:25.00 15Mn 12/21/22 --------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>>/David >>>> >>>>The correct line is the one played in the game which Deep Junior 7.0 follows up >>>>to and including 44. Rxe5 before it strays ... >>> >>>And as you can see Chezzz follows it a little shorter. But the first moves are >>>good enough. >>> >> >>If I give Chezzz the position after blacks Nxf6 it says: >> >>time nodes depth score pv >>00:00:00.00 92n 01/01/03 -0.403 5. Qxc7+! >>00:00:00.00 144n 01/01/07 -0.101 5. Qxc7+ Qd7 (144) >>00:00:00.02 181n 01/01/07 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:00.02 348n 02/03/07 -0.026 5. Qxc7+ Qd7 6. Qc4 (348) >>00:00:00.05 496n 02/03/07 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:00.05 835n 03/04/06 -0.291 5. Qxc7+ Qd7 6. Qc1 Nf7 (835) >>00:00:00.08 1725n 03/04/06 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:00.08 2388n 04/06/08 -0.201 5. Qxc7+ Qd7 6. Qc1 Nf7 >> 7. Nd4 (2388) >>00:00:00.11 5294n 04/06/08 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:00.11 6661n 05/07/08 -0.396 5. Qxc7+ Qd7 6. Qc1 Nf7 >> 7. Qb2 Ne5 (6661) >>00:00:00.11 7006n 05/07/09 +0.132 5. e5! >>00:00:00.14 11kn 05/07/11 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:00.14 12kn 06/09/12 +0.068 5. e5 Nxd5 6. exd6+ Kf7 >> 7. Qf3+ Kg6 8. Re5 (12616) >>00:00:00.19 24kn 06/10/12 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:00.25 52kn 07/11/17 -0.160 5. e5 dxe5 6. Rxe5+ Kf7 >> 7. Qxc7+ Qd7 8. Qxd7+ Nxd7 >> 9. Rxg5 Ra2 (52304) >>00:00:00.35 88kn 07/13/17 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:00.38 102kn 08/17/19 +0.068 5. e5 Nxd5 6. exd6+ Kf7 >> 7. Qf3+ Kg6 8. Re5 (102408) >>00:00:00.78 319kn 08/17/19 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:01.22 608kn 09/18/22 +0.190 5. e5 dxe5 6. Rxe5+ Kf7 >> 7. Qxc7+ Qd7 8. Qxd7+ Nxd7 >> 9. Rxg5 Ke7 (608937) >>00:00:01.96 987kn 09/18/22 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:02.05 1036kn 10/20/21 +0.135 5. e5 dxe5 6. Rxe5+ Kf7 >> 7. Qxc7+ Qd7 8. Qxd7+ Nxd7 >> 9. Rxg5 Rb8 10. Nd4 Rb1+ >> 11. Kg2 Ke7 (1036591) >>00:00:04.38 2303kn 10/20/23 --------------------------------------------------- >>00:00:08.27 4471kn 11/22/27 +0.190 5. e5 dxe5 6. Rxe5+ Kf7 >> 7. Qxc7+ Qd7 8. Qxd7+ Nxd7 >> 9. Rxg5 Ke7 (4471615) >>00:00:13.27 7113kn 11/23/27 --------------------------------------------------- >> >>So it finds it when it gets to this position anyway. In fact it finds it before >>this position. So in a real game, Chezzz would play the correct line. >> >>/David > >Thats very impressive, I always thought Chezzz was really weak, maybe I should >look into playing it more ^_^ > >Reguards >Luis 1)There are a lot of free programs that are weaker than chezzz. 2)Finding one solution does not mean that the program is strong. It can be that in a special position the program has more knowledge and it is also possible that the program find the right move for the wrong reasons. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.