Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 02:52:30 01/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2003 at 05:36:12, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 23, 2003 at 03:57:45, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>Sounds like you are doing history heuristic. A couple of points (which you >>might know already): >> >>1) Make sure you have a separate history table for each colour. > >I have only one history table. >Is it important to have seperate history table for each color? > >Usually when from->to is often legal for white it is not often legal for black. > >I may also get rid of the history table in the future and I guess that there are >better alternatives for order of moves. > >I read that some programmers (like Tony Worten) found that getting rid of >history tables made their program stronger so I guess that they have other rules >to decide about order of moves that are simply better. > >I have only one 64*64 array like tscp. > >Uri When I split my history table in two separate ones I got better moveordering, so it might be a good idea to try it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.