Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:37:36 01/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2003 at 09:30:48, Peter Fendrich wrote: >On January 23, 2003 at 09:25:26, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 23, 2003 at 09:09:33, Peter Fendrich wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2003 at 14:28:30, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>Can say already that they have benefited from ed's release of his programming >>>>ideas? >>>> >>>>Just curious. >>>>Jonas >>> >>>His articles is, for me, the most enjoyable chess programming readings since >>>"Chess Skill In Man and Machine". There are lot's of great ideas that also give >>>raise to new ideas of my own. >>>His different solutions are so well balanced for his own program that I can't >>>just take one of them and think that it will work in my program with it's >>>completely differrent strucuture but I'm convinced that some day some of it will >>>be found in Terra in some, maybe adjusted, form. >>> >>>For instance the idea with EVAL in each node is probably nothing that I will try >>>in the near future because of all the re-think necessary for me. >>>I thought that the days of "evaluation in each node" was counted by now and >>>disappeared with Genius or some of those programs back then (CSTAL is an >>>exception). Ed showed that using eval in all nodes in a smart way definitely can >>>pay off and maybe there more commercials with that design. >>> >>>/Peter >> >>Movei independently from the first day also evaluates every node and maybe there >>are more free programs with that design. >> >>I also do not assume that everything that the commercial do is the best because >>they do not know everything. > >Of course they don't but I think that listening to the ideas behind Rebel is >well spended time bearing in mind it's success and playing style. > >/Peter I agree and I expect a lot of them to be productive for movei. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.