Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:06:21 01/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2003 at 16:45:23, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >On January 22, 2003 at 16:28:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 22, 2003 at 12:57:40, Frank Phillips wrote: >> >>>I stumbled across a couple of interesting games by something called Suturb >>>against Crafty on ICC. >>> >>>There is no hardware information in its finger notes, but it seemed to be >>>outsearching Crafty (on dual 2.6GHz Xeon I guess), by a 1 or 2 ply at times. >>> >>>Is this the gate array chess processor thing from chessbase. >>> >>>Frank >> >> >>Yes. It was "brutus". It seemed to be doing about 1 ply deeper sometimes, >>about the >>same others. They claim it searches about 2.8M nodes per second in the >>hardware, so >>about 3M overall is the max, which is not a lot faster than my dual. The only >>thing is >>it uses a "Kure" book so it generally starts in a favorable position as I >>normally run on >>ICC with my "wide" book to provide variety. I would not play the same openings >>in >>(say) cct6 should I play them. :) But then again, I wouldn't play the openings >>I played >>against it against any reasonable opponent, so there you go. ;) > >Hi Bob, > >this FPGA-monster is able to do a rather sophisticated eval in parallel, so i >guess the "quality" of the nodes is rather huge. IMHO Chrilly's Brutus or other >FPGA-approaches will dominate the scene during the next years, considering that >FPGA hardware has much more potential for further improvement than general >purpose processors. More speed and more knowledge. And of course one may use >multiple FPGAs in some parallel framework - puh. > >Gerd And that's a sure way to grab approximately 0.001% of the chess software market. I'm scared. :) Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.