Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 13:19:46 09/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 1998 at 15:54:08, John Coffey wrote: >Shaun, > >Your perception that you have been slighted seems to me to be way out of >proportion of what actually happened here. Nobdy should ever request that >someone not respond to a post, and if somebody does respond to a post in >a very minor way against your wishes, it should not invoke such outrage on your >part. If you feel that someone has made personal attacks against you then you >should take that up with the moderators or the person, rather than "make a >scene." Personally I don't give a fractional damn what kind of bizarre turf division may be happening in this current situation. I am not about to become involved in members' private disputes such as: "You promised never to misspell 'their' again, and there you went, you did it again, I'm going to kill you, you lying jerk." If someone wants to do that kind of stuff, they can do it by email, and please leave the moderators out of it. Meanwhile, each post here will be evaluated as to its conformance with the charter, which is not re-negotiable on an inter-member basis. To be more clear, if A calls B a lying pig-dog and threatens to hang him from a lamp post and beat him with a broomstick, and B writes this wonderful post explaining that he forgives A because he thinks A has had too much sun recently, B's post will be ignored by the moderators (I presume to speak for us all, but I haven't discussed this with them) and A will get some email. This protects everyone, simplifies everything, and prevents the moderators from having to interpret contracts between individual CCC members. I hope this is clear. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.