Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rolf's Thesis (exact wording!)

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 10:33:17 02/04/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 04, 2003 at 12:38:07, Peter Hegger wrote:

>On February 04, 2003 at 11:35:55, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>(much snippage)
>
>>4.) in a defined period of time, say half a year, the progs are forbidden to be
>>changed; new games into book are allowed, techno bugs are allowed to be
>>corrected; but the chess system of the engine version jan-june is constant;
>>books are allowed but without lines no computer ever could solve actually;
>>tables must be discussed by the nasters themselves and possibly forbidden and
>>reduced or such!
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen
>
>Rolf,
>Yes, this would definetely give the poor human a much better chance to compete.
>But don't you think this is stacking the deck in favour of the humans a little
>too much?
>I, personally, could never beat my car in a race if it were set up and running
>properly. However, if I pulled off a few spark plug wires, let the air out of
>the tires and drained out the oil, I would then stand an excellent chance of
>defeating it.
>This is basically what you want to do to the programs. You want to weaken it,
>like I would weaken my car and then when it loses you can say " see, I told you
>that the programs are not that strong".
>Would that really be fair?
>Regards,
>Peter

No, I don't see the analogy here. You reason as if the prog should simply play
chess as it is. And I am saying that we need rules for human-comp competition.
You might be right that today we would get advantage for humans, but that is
also exactly what is the truth, if you believe experts, but I wanted to give a
general approach also for the next couple of years. It will become more and more
difficult. I don't get what you mean with advantages. You insinuate that it's
unfair if we would play like this? So fair is only fair if we let the computer
side do what they want? Peter, I know that a constant identity is a problem.
Computerchess programmers do want hourly tweakings. But I fear you all oversee
what tweaking means for human players. They must feel like secondary garbage
just being used for the glory of CC and the machine.

Peter, just forget it, let's skip the tournament chess of humans and machines
and continue with the hoax of show events. Kill your own future. Do what you
want. I won't stop you.

Rolf Tueschen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.