Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 14:57:47 09/28/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 1998 at 22:28:41, Don Dailey wrote: >On September 27, 1998 at 21:11:21, Detlef Pordzik wrote: > >>On September 26, 1998 at 16:19:46, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>> >>>On September 26, 1998 at 15:54:08, John Coffey wrote: >>> >>>>Shaun, >>>> >>>>Your perception that you have been slighted seems to me to be way out of >>>>proportion of what actually happened here. Nobdy should ever request that >>>>someone not respond to a post, and if somebody does respond to a post in >>>>a very minor way against your wishes, it should not invoke such outrage on your >>>>part. If you feel that someone has made personal attacks against you then you >>>>should take that up with the moderators or the person, rather than "make a >>>>scene." >>> >>>Personally I don't give a fractional damn what kind of bizarre turf division may >>>be happening in this current situation. >>> >>>I am not about to become involved in members' private disputes such as: "You >>>promised never to misspell 'their' again, and there you went, you did it again, >>>I'm going to kill you, you lying jerk." >>> >>>If someone wants to do that kind of stuff, they can do it by email, and please >>>leave the moderators out of it. Meanwhile, each post here will be evaluated as >>>to its conformance with the charter, which is not re-negotiable on an >>>inter-member basis. >>> >>>To be more clear, if A calls B a lying pig-dog and threatens to hang him from a >>>lamp post and beat him with a broomstick, and B writes this wonderful post >>>explaining that he forgives A because he thinks A has had too much sun recently, >>>B's post will be ignored by the moderators (I presume to speak for us all, but I >>>haven't discussed this with them) and A will get some email. >>> >>>This protects everyone, simplifies everything, and prevents the moderators from >>>having to interpret contracts between individual CCC members. >>> >>>I hope this is clear. >>> >>>bruce >> >>I thankfully have nothing to do with all this - >>but reading this mail has lightend my night hour reading on CCC - alot. >>Yet the original theme is quite serious - how on earth could you set up such a >>brilliant + funnly mail on this ! >>Great thing, really. I may get dull allready , but I laughed to tears. >>( At least one thing to laugh about in here....) >> >>c/u >> >>ELVIS > >This group is certainly entertaining. I have been laughing all night >as I catch up with the post reading. I love the way each tiny point >is put under a microscope and examined in detail. > >Whittingtons posts were funny too, the funniest I've seen in a long >time. We have a sense of humor too! > >- Don I don't love this " microscope examining of each n' every dot " so I suggest, that you soemthimes rather resign than laugh; viewing the newest - to me - star on this heaven of spreading anger + hatred..... ( not polite to name mr. s ) BTW : who dared to question the moderators humor...:-) ? c/u ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.