Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Maybe I understand better now ....

Author: Don Dailey

Date: 09:10:44 09/30/98

Go up one level in this thread



>>Which is pretty much how I do it.  But my main point actually was how
>>one should THINK about null move selectivity.  Thinking of it this way
>>is a great simplification and can make it easier to understand.
>>
>>My program actually does a null move search with a zero width window
>>around beta, so I don't actually get to raise alpha.  In lots of testing
>>I did this was more efficient, I don't know if anyone else has tried
>>this or finds it useful.   I also do my test at the top of the search
>>like you do but after making the move passed to the search function.
>>
>
>
>My null-search is also with beta-1,beta as the window, because I only care
>about failing high, and wouldn't trust the null-move to "raise alpha" in
>those few cases where I am not already doing a null-window search in the
>PVS code.

Hi Bob,

I have the same concern. There were a few positions that caused problems
and since the zero window is fast, there seems to be no justification
for having to put up with the alpha problem.

- Don



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.