Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:27:26 02/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2003 at 08:43:12, Bob Durrett wrote: > >Excellent points. The "bottom line" is that SSDF presented their findings >properly, but the problem is in interpretation. SSDF cannot be held responsible >for errors in interpretation. > >Bob D. Wrong conclusion. I tried to explain the points but apparently it's a bit too difficult. In short : If you use a system of statistics you are not allowed to make your own presentation. The presentation by SSDF is FALSE. That is the point. False and unallowed. Instead of 1., 2., 3., they should say 1.-3., not should, but must, if the differences in the actual results are way smaller than the error in the tests itself. Is that impossible to understand? Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.