Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:38:38 02/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2003 at 07:07:57, Peter Berger wrote: >On February 16, 2003 at 18:19:40, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 16, 2003 at 18:13:42, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2003 at 17:59:14, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On February 16, 2003 at 17:48:19, Peter Berger wrote: >>>> >>>>>No Rolf, my comment is only about chess - I am convinced that Nxg4 is simply the >>>>>very strongest move and everything else is garbage. Feel welcome to challenge >>>>>this assessment with analysis either of your own or published one - but please >>>>>don't forget to add another move that leads to at least a position of similar >>>>>merit. >>>>> >>>>>I think Nxg4 is a very good example for a move played by a computer that looks >>>>>weak to amateurs unless they spend a lot of time looking at the position and has >>>>>the potential to even fool players of higher strength. It looks messy, but is >>>>>strong. >>>>> >>>>>Regards, >>>>>Peter >>>> >>>> >>>>Ok, let's take only that chess question. You say the move is fantastic? >>> >>>OK ;) - yes I actually do in fact. >>> >>>So it >>>>wins? I say it is a bad LINE and perhaps Nxg4 is the "best" move. But it is >>>>still in a bad line. Michael said Black must avoid the 0-0. Read his message. He >>>>also gives the neccessary moves. I won't imposter with his moves. >>>> >>> >>>I have analyzed the game - I didn't follow the thread you are referring to. >>>Please point me to the post you want to discuss. >>> >>>Thanks in advance. >>>Peter >> >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?284683 > >OK - I get your point now. First you said that Sxg4 was a horrible move - here I >contradicted as I disagree and think it is the only and best move. I didn't >expect you to change topics so fast > >For an expert opinion about Nxg4: > >http://www.worldchessrating.com/522004712.html?282334552146494 > >Now you say you want to discuss O-O and think this is a very weak move not >worthy of a super-grandmaster. I agree that this move might be bad, although I >don't think it is that horrible at all - I have seen much worse played by human >super-grandmasters. > >Peter I did not _change_ topics. O-O is an absolute must for the judgement about the quality of Nxg4. Simply by evaluating both moves seperately is no solution. But I think that all that has been discussed. In combination with O-O the move Nxg4 is horrible, no matter if you agree or disagree. Certain questions have no personal background. What is your rating in chess, do you play tournaments? Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.