Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:21:58 02/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2003 at 09:04:27, Albert Silver wrote: >If one feels Chessbase's use of the SSDF to promote a program distorts >the truth about it, don't blame the SSDF, blame Chessbase. As to it's >non-inclusion of Fritz 8 so far, yes, it is very likely a commercial move, but >if someone were to buy 6-8 copies of Frtiz 8 and send it to them, I believe they >would start testing it. If they refused, THEN one would be quite correct to >question the SSDF's independence. > Nobody doubted their honesty. If independence is discussed then it is not doubting their integrity. But why could they test SHREDDER in times when it was forbidden to publish its results? I want a clear answer! I think if that was possible then it should also possible for at least one tester to buy Fritz8! I could lend Tony my version! Independence means you test with no direct influence by ChessBase. But this is not the case. Uri even suggests that they should only test on demand! Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.