Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Itanium2 Testing Crafty & Tinker Informal Results (new information)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:00:50 02/18/03

Go up one level in this thread


One important thing I had forgotten.  The SPEC version of crafty is not the same
as a
"production" version.  For example, the COMPACT_ATTACKS stuff is all gone.  In
fact, all such compile options (for performance-ralated issues) are missing, so
that all
vendors get to use the same basic algorithm.

This means that the SPEC version is certainly going to be slower than the normal
version,
for a specific platform.  But since things like COMPACT_ATTACKS were written for
machines with fairly small cache, it seemed reasonable when working with the
SPEC
folks to eliminate such things or else the SPEC numbers become harder to
understand.

Therefore, don't compare _anything_ to the SPEC version, it has no tablebases,
no book,
all the ancillary stuff (learning, etc) has been removed as well, so that the
compilation
process is not so daunting...

In particular, the time to run the test is good to compare different processors
and compilers,
but only using the spec crafty code, not any distributed version, even though it
might have the
same version number.  The X86 assembly is not used in the spec version for
obvious reasons,
which is a further slow-down.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.