Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 14:24:13 02/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2003 at 17:09:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 18, 2003 at 16:57:59, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 15, 2003 at 15:38:30, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On February 15, 2003 at 15:26:13, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On February 15, 2003 at 14:52:10, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 15, 2003 at 14:34:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Answer me this, What Difference Does it make if you play more >>>>>>>positional chess, if you cannot defeated me?? >>>>>> >>>>>>If that were the case, I would agree. But by the same token, do you want >>>>>>your program to play 30 brilliant moves and one lemon move, over and over? >>>>>>That one lemon will drag your performance _way_ down at the top of the rating >>>>>>scale. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Bob, may I point out with humility that this is exactly my weak-chain argument? >>>>>Finally we are on the point. Did you ever reflect what would happen if >>>>> >>>>> - in a really recompensating money atmosphere and >>>>> >>>>> - after top players adopted specific comp related chess? >>>>> >>>>>And that on the base of a known permanent weakness? >>>>> >>>>>That is the point. And not the typical hype based on show events /commercials. >>>>> >>>>>What is you impression with the GM play on ICC? But note, Roman D. had to face >>>>>an always changed version [on the base of his own hints]. Guess what will happen >>>>>if several top GM work hard on a counter strategy against comps, in other words >>>>>if GM adopt 'Eduard'... >>>> >>>> >>>>You clearly have no clue as to what actually happens. >>> >>> >>>Note that nobody here must come with humility! It was a bit irony by me. But - >>>you are a bit too respectless. Why? >>> >>>Here you completely miss my point. You should read it again and always think >>>about tournament times. Not Blitz. >> >>You seem to have finally answered your own question. >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?285129 >> >>Sarah > >I don't understand what you might possibly mean. Because here to you and there >to Matthew Hull I always said the same. Bob can't have spoken about tournament >chess. Crafty is NOT playing tournament chess on ICC. So you are wrong and also >Matthew is wrong because he wanted to take Bob as if he had said that for >tournament chess they are GM. Wrong - Bob said the opposite. > >Let's wait until Bob says what he meant. :) The Crafty-GMGuseinov match on FICS was two draws at slow time controls. Matt > >Rolf Tueschen > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>Roman may be good against comps and there are other GM's and IM's that are, and >>>>there are also many, that try daily over and over and over and simply see loss >>>>after loss after loss. >>>> >>>>Scrappy has been playing jnogueiras who is GM Jesús Nogueiras Santiago >>>>for days and scrappy has been slaughtering him. While IM Alexis Cabrera handle >>>>Minotauro has for the most part scored about even. >>>> >>>>Point being that some maybe able to adapt their game to an anti-computer type >>>>play (trading pieces etc) others never manage despite playing endlessly. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Only then, and that is my argument since long, the actual commercial progs begin >>>>>to SUCK. But on a permanent base! >>>>> >>>>>My questions to Amir went a bit in the same direction. Let's see how far the >>>>>experts can open their mind. >>>>> >>>>>Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.