Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 11:15:30 10/01/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 1998 at 09:03:43, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: >On October 01, 1998 at 08:46:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>If you generate one move at a time, how are you searching the best captures >>first? MVV/LVA? using SEE can reduce the size of that tree significantly >based on tests a couple of us ran 3 years ago... > >Was that data published anywhere? Or do you have it still handy by chance? > >My own tests with "DarkThought" do not show any significant differences >between MVV/LVA and SEE. > >Could it be that your observed gains were due to aggressive SEE pruning in >the quiescence search instead of yielding gains by better move ordering in >higher parts of the search tree? I also got a smaller tree by doing interior node ordering with a SEE, but that was years ago and I don't have any numbers. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.