Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 19:09:21 02/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2003 at 22:03:40, Matt Taylor wrote: >On February 22, 2003 at 20:42:41, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>all. The most likely explanation is that AMD doesn't think their current >>processors will benefit very much from hyperthreading, so it's not worth it. >>The P4 does, however, benefit a lot from it, so it's used. > >Athlon would benefit. AMD's focus has not been on HyperThreading. Their >attention has been turned toward a means of eliminating bottlenecks. Their >attention has also been turned toward restructuring and becoming profitable. >They have been losing lots of money. I don't doubt that it would benefit _some_. But it's not clear whether or not it would benefit them more than to put the same resources into something else.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.