Author: Will Singleton
Date: 11:26:15 10/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 1998 at 21:21:09, Roberto Waldteufel wrote: > >Yes, I have noticed more improvement when one move is clearly best than when >there are many plausible candidates, but I had put that down to the nature of >the null move! If there are many plausible moves, then that leaves fewer >terrible moves to cause null-move cutoffs on the next ply. Do you find the same >effect with R=1 as with R=2? I suspect that nodes with a clearly best move are >just plain easier to handle than the rest. > >Best wishes, >Roberto I have have bad luck with R=1, causes things to go weird, something to do with my search algorithm. So I can only use R=2. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.