Author: José Carlos
Date: 03:04:06 03/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2003 at 18:55:09, Peter Berger wrote: >On March 16, 2003 at 16:48:19, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: > >>On March 15, 2003 at 14:11:38, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>That's the spirit >> >>What? Showing off with other's work, being caught as a fraud, and continue as if >>nothing happened? >> >>Some spirit. >> >>J. > >Your partial quote of my post was misleading IMHO. But if you ask me - being >caught as a fraud and then to continue in a different way ( namely legal and >correct) looks just right to me and better than to silently vanish. While I >definitely don't hold my breath waiting for the announced new features for >Pepito programmed by Denis I don't get what some posters expect from him. Some >posts seem to suggest that he should ask for public forgiveness - is it the >business of the people who ask for it? > >Who has been harmed - Carlos del Cacho? Carlos has posted, there is nothing left >to discuss here, he gave his opinion. > >Another issue is the time of people who wasted their time testing Pepito as a >Deep <9> beta - but again this is a private matter between these testers and >Denis. If they are pissed and post their disappointment in public, that's their >business and they certainly have all my sympathy. > >Then there is the group of engine authors who might take offense with his >hilarious actions .. - OK. > >Why anyone else should want to jump on Denis escapes me. Very easy. He has lied to the computer chess community. He must apologize, but only if he wants to enter the computer chess community he has offended. Of course, if he wants to vanish, there's no need to apologize. But presenting a project to the community without apologizing for his previous offense is not acceptable IMO. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.