Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:51:47 03/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2003 at 14:05:24, Peter Berger wrote: >On March 24, 2003 at 13:48:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 24, 2003 at 12:57:00, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>I think that the concept of using a program to confirm win/lose/draw in such >>positions is actually pretty funny, overall. :) >> >>This is _not_ the computer's strong point. >> > >It depends. Encouraged by your remark I tried it with Yace myself - after about >5 minutes of showing it some critical lines I get: > That was the point. You have to walk a program around a few different lines and let it store scores. Which means you can't trust the score for the _original_ position very well... >Neue Partie >[D]8/p7/1k6/4p2p/K1Pp2pb/3P2P1/3N4/8 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Yace 0.99.78b: > >2.gxh4 g3 3.c5+ Kc6 4.Kb4 a5+ 5.Kc4 g2 6.Sf3 Kc7 7.Sg1 Kc6 8.Sf3 Kc7 9.Sg1 Kc6 >10.Sf3 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 22/34 00:01:09 91324kN > >This includes analysis of the discussed mainlines so far which were my starting >point.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.