Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Importance of TBs once more!(an example to mistake of computer)

Author: Howard Exner

Date: 03:48:42 10/13/98

Go up one level in this thread


On October 13, 1998 at 06:05:55, blass uri wrote:

>
>On October 13, 1998 at 05:54:00, blass uri wrote:
>
>>
>>On October 13, 1998 at 04:34:00, Amir Ban wrote:
>>
>>>On October 13, 1998 at 02:12:24, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>In SSDF game archive there is 5834 games. In 21 games there is KQ-KR ending.
>>>>And 20 of these were won by Q side WITHOUT any use of TBs! Quite surprising -
>>>>isn't this normally considered as difficult ending?
>>>
>>>I've never seen this ending in a computer-computer game where the side with the
>>>queen failed to win, at any time control.
>>>
>>>This endgame is quite easy for a computer.
>>
>>Is it easy when the defendor use tablebases?
>>
>>I found that the defendor without tablebases(when the defendor is a computer
>>program) may miss a simple draw by perpetual check in positions when there is
>>black queen at f2 and white king at h1.
>
>Here is an example
>
>7R/8/8/8/8/k7/5q2/7K white to move and draw
>Fritz5(without tablebases) plays Rg8 and Junior5(16 bit) Rh3+
>when Ra8+ is the only way to draw.

This theme was also seen in Jouni's nice endgame positions:
8/k7/8/2R5/8/4q3/8/4B2K w - - id "Bg3";
Would any non tablebase program play Bg3?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.