Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: King majority

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 08:34:25 05/07/03

Go up one level in this thread


On May 07, 2003 at 10:51:54, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:

>On May 07, 2003 at 10:31:05, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On May 07, 2003 at 04:40:43, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>
>>>King majority wins in this game Pitschak - Foerder played in 1930.
>>>
>>>[D]1R6/p3k1p1/7p/2b1pP2/P1r3P1/B7/7P/7K w - - 0 1
>>>
>>>1.Rc8! Kd6 2.Rxc5! Rxc5 3.h4!+- 1-0
>>>
>>>Enrique
>>
>>
>>I'm a bit lost here.  What "king majority" are we talking about?  I don't
>>see one for white.
>
>f-g-h white pawns against g-h black pawns. White pawns win in this position. How
>long does it take for Crafty to pick Rc8 with a winning evaluation?
>
>Enrique


I think he is smart enough to figure out your intention, but has chosen to do
otherwise.

The expression "king side majority" rather than "king majority" is normal.

Also, literally speaking, Black has an equal number of King side pawns (the
e-g-h pawns vs the f-g-h pawns), so there is a parity in pawn numbers on the
King side rather than a majority. Like yourself, I do not use this
interpretation, but this is perhaps the one RH prefers.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.