Author: Andreas Stabel
Date: 00:21:10 05/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2003 at 18:35:44, Richard Pijl wrote: >On May 06, 2003 at 17:13:54, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 06, 2003 at 16:58:13, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>It would be too good to be true (german saying zu gut um wahr zu sein) if Baron >>>would solve this position in just a few seconds. >> >>I thought when I read about it that the baron solved it because of special >>knowledge because I read in the past that richard planned to do >>the baron good in endgames so I thought that he taught the baron about >>the pattern in the endgame(It is possible to do it but >>I prefer to spend time about more productive changes >>and I still have problems with correct >>productive evaluation of normal unstoppable >>passed pawns). >> >>Uri > >Unfortunately it was a bug in unstoppable passed pawn detection. >I corrected the error and Baron is no Superman anymore. >Baron is now thinking for over 7 minutes and hasn't even selected e5 yet :-( > >Richard. I love this - Baron found the right move in a few seconds - that was too good to be true, so a bug was corrected - now the new improved Baron doesn't see the solution at all - progress ! Science is a strange thing :) Regards Andreas Stabel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.