Author: R. Vingerhoeds
Date: 10:46:17 10/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 1998 at 01:25:05, Howard Exner wrote:
>On October 14, 1998 at 14:23:17, R. Vingerhoeds wrote:
>
>>On October 14, 1998 at 01:55:00, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>BT2630, BT2830, ECMF5, my 24 positions endgame test, LCTII or others?
>>>
>>>thanks Jouni
>>
>>
>>Hello Jouni,
>>
>>Today I received the Rebel 10 CD-ROM and ran two tests.
>>One on my AMD K6 266MMX and one on the AMD K6 200MMX.
>>The 266 with 28 MB hash scored a gained elo of 2545 when I ran
>>the LCT 2 test.
>>The 200 with 13 MB hash scored a gained elo of 2385 wheb I ran
>>the BT2630 test.
>>The last test was a bit disappoiting because R10 lost 11 elo-points
>>compared with R9, under the same conditions.
>>The LCT 2 test on the 266 scored 25 elo-points higher than the R9 under the same
>>conditions (which means under DOS).
>>
>>More tests to go.....
>
>Are there any positions in these tests where Rebel 10 is solving the positions
>considerably faster than Rebel 9? Example of what I mean: Rebel 9 solves
>position X in 7 minutes while Rebel 10 solves it in say 3 minutes or less.
I can only compare the results of the LCT 2 test ran with the AMD 266MMX,
becouse i lost the results of the BT2630-test. Sorry about that!
R9 R10
pos 7 126 sec. 2 sec.
pos 8 16 sec. 161.sec.
pos 9 600 sec. 47 sec.!
pos 30 17 sec. 205 sec.
As you can see is only pos 9 very different. The others, well...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.