Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hmm . . . is Junior5 not good enough??

Author: Mark Young

Date: 09:35:19 10/18/98

Go up one level in this thread


On October 18, 1998 at 12:26:50, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>
>On October 18, 1998 at 12:13:09, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>
>>On October 18, 1998 at 12:05:07, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>I know, I just don't find CST at all interesting, as project or anyting else.
>>>I can setup CM6000 to play close to the same style as CST, and it will play as
>>>unsound a moves as CST. I just don't call it a project or interesting or fun.
>>
>>I do, but it may be a matter of taste.
>>
>>How about saying that Mchess is a much better CST than CST? That's what I
>>thought of it many times.
>
>CST plays creative sacrifices in a high percentage of its games.  I haven't seen
>the same kind of stuff from MChess, personally.
>
I have, I does play many sacrifices (Creative? I don't find creative to be to
right word. maybe unsound or dubious is better for both CST and Mchess)IMO

>bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.