Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 20:14:59 05/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
My only point is that you are stating your opinion, then trying to prove that opinion as correct (which is impossible, since it is an opinion), and then telling other people that their opinion is wrong because it differs from your own. That is a religious argument if I've ever heard one. I personally don't care for either shuffle chess or FRC, so don't call me religious because I pointed out that you were being religious. I'm not against them, and would probably be interested if that became the main style of chess, but it isn't. This is my personal favorite example of religion in your arguments. You claim it is a pity that someone would still favor shuffle chess...even after they were priveledged enough to hear the gospel of Fischer Random Chess, as told by you. http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?298667 "The pity is that you still keep favorizing Shuffle Chess." How arrogant. It's a pity that you are so obsessed with something so meaningless as the promotion of one chess variant over another. If you were so devoted to something that mattered, maybe you could make the world a better place. Whatever you do, please stop telling people that their opinion is wrong just because it differs from your own opinion.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.