Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 09:37:21 06/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 04, 2003 at 12:17:33, Russell Reagan wrote: >On June 04, 2003 at 11:47:15, Andrey Popov wrote: > >>>Why not ponder on? >>> >>Of course, if you have a dual machine or two machines with Auto232, >>the ponder=on option is better. >>However, Amy 0.8.3 has a problem with ponder=on. > >I have a dual machine, but if Amy has a problem with pondering, maybe I should >run it with ponder off? Do you mean running it all with ponder on? Why punish the others if one engine has a bug? /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.