Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 15:46:14 06/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2003 at 17:56:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>Uh oh, is little Bobby Hyatt upset because I found 10 games? I can imagine your >>lower lip quivering right now. "But, but, but, that's not what I meant! Uhhhh, >>maybe I was running on my laptop! Uhhhhh, maybe you were using different >>accounts! Uhhhh, best 2 out of 3? C'mon, please?" > >Nope, not "upset" at all. "surprised" would be a better word. But you >found 10. I actually found _two_ sets of 10 games where you were very >slightly ahead. > >But there are 28 _other_ 10 game combinations. I'm therefore surprised you >would think your single group means much other than that an "exceptional >condition can happen if you try often enough." How do you know I think it means anything? You said find 10 games, I found 10 games. I always thought it was a stupid, meaningless challenge, but hey, it was easy so I did it. >>The fact is, neither of us can prove our case to the other person's >>satisfaction. > >Sure we can. Log on to ICC tonight. Pick the hardware. I have PII/400's, Oh, sure, a match tonight will prove that Crafty was better than Stobor in, e.g., March 1999? I never made the claim that Stobor is currently better than Crafty. >At most every sample point I have seen, Crafty was stronger. If you take _all_ What sample points are those? Some games from 6 years ago? -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.