Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 13:16:19 07/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2003 at 23:37:47, Jay Urbanski wrote: >On July 04, 2003 at 23:33:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: > ><snip> >>"way better than MPI". Both use TCP/IP, just like PVM. Except that MPI/OpenMP >>is designed for homogeneous clusters while PVM works with heterogeneous mixes. >>But for any of the above, the latency is caused by TCP/IP, _not_ the particular >>library being used. > >With latency a concern I don't know why you'd use TCP/IP as the transport for >MPI when there are much faster ones available. > >Even VIA over Ethernet would be an improvement. I ignored the statement of Hyatt there even. Such crap it is. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.