Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GK's "last stand for humanity"

Author: Alexander Yates

Date: 20:34:47 07/16/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 16, 2003 at 22:49:04, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote:

>On July 16, 2003 at 22:19:18, Sally Weltrop wrote:
>
>>On his "last stand for humanity"
>>
>>If this is such a hearfelt longing to redeem the human race. Why doesn't he put
>>his heart & $$ where his mouth is.
>>
>>NO appearance fee and say a 12 game match with these stipulations:
>>
>>
>>a win   =  $100,000
>>a draw  =  $30,000
>>a loss  =  $25,000
>>
>>
>>He'd actually stand to win more than last match. The games would be much more
>>intense AND it would generate much more publicity & excitement than the "puppet
>>matchs" we've been having lately.
>>
>>"last stand for humanity"
>>
>>
>>HA!
>>
>>It's been 6 years Garry and you still haven't done it. Time to stop the excuses
>>and accept what people really want to see and not for your benefit.
>The Money does not matter here ;as Garry or anybody else is just not strong
>enough to do the job.The late matches were not puppet matches ;The reason Fritz
>and Junior looked bad in the games they lost is because these 2 programs are
>not particularly good against humans.But they do well against other programs.
>Indeed this is a point that is not understood by many people here .That is a
>program like Fritz may be better than say program Y by 100 elo points in
>the SSDF list but program Y may be beeter than Fritz by 100 elo points or more
>when matched against humans.Garry should in my opinion play against
>CHESSMASTER.Then he stands no chance of winning.

Absolute Nonsense!

What does a patzer know?

I can beat CM...so Garry would crush it, if he chose to do so....programmes are
stupid and can be lead into areas the can't understand....that's a fact!

GM Yates



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.