Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 19:37:26 07/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2003 at 20:07:32, Matthew White wrote: >On July 29, 2003 at 18:17:24, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On July 29, 2003 at 16:12:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >> >>>>This is just another area where you know nothing, but write as though you are >>>>an expert. >>>> >>>>BTW, Hsu's move generator is _not_ a lot better than Belle. All you have to >>>>do is read his paper to see what he did... >>> >>>Of course everyone can. It is described at several papers. What Brutus has is a >>>*lot* better i can garantuee it. >>> >>>Hsu didn't program in verilog or some hardware language. because of that it is >>>amazing he managed to get stuff bugfree to work. However you can't simply >>>compare all that university stuff with what Donninger has! >> >>Are you joking? >> >>A hand laid out board is *TONS* faster (and stable) than an auto placed & routed >>design. They teach you that in like the 2nd class of EE. >> >>University stuff? Cause the knowledge from a few MiT grads working with IBM is >>probably pre-k stuff right? Nothing close to what Chessbase can do with chips. > >It's the same type of opimization problem that we have with compilers... For >certain things, you just can't beat good hand assembly... don't compare assembly with processor design at the lowest level. putting logics by hand and so on yourself is no fun. Assembly is a very high level language compared to low level processor design. I hope you realize that... >Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.